Everything / Models and research / OpenAI
OpenAI Steady
On TutorHero's Everything Index, OpenAI is steady on GitHub: 3.24 of every 10,000 new public repos over the last three months (3.0k a month), +102% vs a year ago. The 12-month forecast says edging up (+25%). By the end of 2032, lines in the same state ended between 0.01x and 2.5x of where they started (median 0.54x).
Since 2019, and the range to 2032
New repos per 10,000 (3-month average, log scale)12-month forecastRange to 2032: middle half and 90% of past similar lines
The range is not a forecast of this line: it is what GitHub lines in the same state (more than doubled its share of new repos in a year) did 1 to 5 years later, 2019 to 2026, applied to today's level. Past 5 years it is stretched, not measured. Checked out of time (learned before 2022, scored after), 71% of outcomes landed inside the 90% range, so read it as wide. Open it in the Everything chart.
Week by week
Wikipedia views a day, last 8 weeks
New public repos with the openai tag each week (Monday to Sunday, UTC). The outlined bars, last week included, are still filling in, as tags are often added days after a repo is created, so their height will grow a little. "Against the field" divides the change by what the typical tag did, so a wave that lifts every tag does not count. Hover for the numbers.
Built vs talked about
Each line is its own share (of all new GitHub repos, all Hacker News stories, all English Wikipedia views, all new stars on the repos we track), shown as a share of its own peak, so the timing and shape compare even though the units differ. Hover for the counts. Tap a name to hide or show a line.
What it means
- A steady field: OpenAI moved +102% in a year, so skills here keep their value without a rush.
- Start by reading diegosouzapw/OmniRoute (+13.0k stars in 3 months) and NousResearch/hermes-agent (+12.3k stars in 3 months).
- People to follow: Microsoft, AutoGPT, LangGenius.
- Getting crowded: new repos +102% but attention -6%, so each new project competes harder for stars.
- 21.9 new stars per new repo over 3 months, vs 8.50 for the typical trend: more demand per project than most fields.
- The 12-month forecast for its share: +25% (Edging up).
- Talked about more than built: Hacker News +77% vs new repos +102% in a year, more talk per builder than the typical trend, so demand for builders may run ahead of supply.
- History: of past GitHub lines that more than doubled its share of new repos in a year, 61% had a smaller share 3 to 5 years later and 8% at least doubled.
- Attention: 11.6% of new stars on the repos we track, -6% in a year.
- Hacker News: 354 stories a month, +77% share in a year; Wikipedia 223k views a month, -16%.
- Not investment advice: this measures what people build on GitHub, not any company.
- Most-starred tools here lately: diegosouzapw/OmniRoute (vouched), NousResearch/hermes-agent (vouched).
- A settled field: favour tools with a long record.
Repos carrying it now
People building it
More in Models and research
Questions
Is OpenAI growing on GitHub?
Yes. Its share of all new public GitHub repos is +102% vs a year ago and -12% over the last three months (Sep 2026). Phase: Steady.
How many new OpenAI repos are created each month?
About 3.0k new public repos a month carry the openai tag (three-month average to Sep 2026), or 3.24 of every 10,000 new repos.
What will OpenAI look like in 2032?
Nobody knows, and we say how much. Of past GitHub lines that more than doubled its share of new repos in a year, the middle half had between 0.14x and 1.27x of their share 3 to 5 years later, and 61% ended smaller.
Is OpenAI more talked about than built?
Talked about more than built. Over the year its share of Hacker News stories moved +77% while its share of new GitHub repos moved +102%. New repos grew faster than talk for most AI trends this year, so the label compares it with the typical trend: 3.2 times the talk per builder of the median trend.
Not investment advice. Measurements of what people build and star on GitHub, a statistical forecast, base rates and a model's reading of them. Nothing here is about any company's revenue, valuation or stock.