THTutorHero

Everything / Models and research / TensorFlow

Trend in Models and research · tag tensorflow · through Sep 2026

TensorFlow Faded

On TutorHero's Everything Index, TensorFlow is faded on GitHub: 0.79 of every 10,000 new public repos over the last three months (732 a month), -6% vs a year ago and 0.80x its level when ChatGPT launched. The 12-month forecast says holding (-2%). By the end of 2032, lines in the same state ended between 0.22x and 3.2x of where they started (median 0.71x).

Per 10k new repos0.79732 new repos a month
Year over year-6%3 months: -8%
Next 12 months-2%80% band -17% to +216%
2032, median of history0.71x90% of past cases: 0.22x to 3.2x
Attention0.16%of new stars, -76% in a year
Jev 2032 call0.34xBottom quarter of similar lines
Share on X

Since 2019, and the range to 2032

0.31320192020202120222023202420252026202720282029203020312032Range to 2032 (history of similar lines)Stable Diffusion releasedChatGPT launchesGPT-4Llama 2, open weightsModel Context ProtocolDeepSeek-R1Claude Code previewHigh 2.52Median 0.56Jev 0.27Low 0.18

New repos per 10,000 (3-month average, log scale)12-month forecastRange to 2032: middle half and 90% of past similar linesJev's 2032 call

The range is not a forecast of this line: it is what GitHub lines in the same state (held its share within 15% for a year) did 1 to 5 years later, 2019 to 2026, applied to today's level. Past 5 years it is stretched, not measured. Checked out of time (learned before 2022, scored after), 71% of outcomes landed inside the 90% range, so read it as wide. Open it in the Everything chart.

Week by week

Last week169 new reposOct 12 to Oct 18 · -30% against the field
Last 4 weeks▼ -23%596 new repos, against the 4 weeks before and the field
Wikipedia, 7 days1.7k views+8% against the 4 weeks before, all of Wikipedia the same way
AprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Wikipedia views a day, last 8 weeks

Aug 28Sep 4Sep 11Sep 18Sep 25Oct 2Oct 9Oct 16

New public repos with the tensorflow tag each week (Monday to Sunday, UTC). The outlined bars, last week included, are still filling in, as tags are often added days after a repo is created, so their height will grow a little. "Against the field" divides the change by what the typical tag did, so a wave that lifts every tag does not count. Hover for the numbers.

Built vs talked about

Hacker News0 stories a month-100% share of HN vs a year ago · titles with "tensorflow"
Wikipedia7.9k views a month-38% share of Wikipedia vs a year ago · TensorFlow
Talk vs buildingTalked about more than builtWikipedia -38% vs GitHub new repos -6% over the year, compared with the typical trend

Each line is its own share (of all new GitHub repos, all Hacker News stories, all English Wikipedia views, all new stars on the repos we track), shown as a share of its own peak, so the timing and shape compare even though the units differ. Hover for the counts. Tap a name to hide or show a line.

What it means

Studentslearning it, contributing, getting hiredWatch
  • Learn the ideas more than the name: TensorFlow is faded, -76% below its Apr 2019 high.
  • Start by reading roboflow/supervision (+1.4k stars in 3 months) and kserve/kserve (+219 stars in 3 months).
  • People to follow: PhotoPrism, Google Research, Blake Blackshear.
  • Jev for someone who wants to contribute or get hired: Watch (0.7 of 4).
Founders and builderswhat to build nextWatch
  • Both falling: new repos -6%, attention -76% in a year.
  • 1.10 new stars per new repo over 3 months, vs 8.50 for the typical trend: more supply than demand right now.
  • The 12-month forecast for its share: -2% (Holding).
  • Talked about more than built: Wikipedia -38% vs new repos -6% in a year, more talk per builder than the typical trend, so demand for builders may run ahead of supply.
  • Jev for a builder: Watch (0.5 of 4).
Investorswhich fields deserve research timePass for now
  • History: of past GitHub lines that held its share within 15% for a year, 58% had a smaller share 3 to 5 years later and 10% at least doubled.
  • Jev's 2032 call: bottom quarter of similar lines (unsure), which on the base rates means about 0.34x today's share by the end of 2032.
  • Attention: 0.16% of new stars on the repos we track, -76% in a year.
  • Hacker News: 0 stories a month, -100% share in a year; Wikipedia 7.9k views a month, -38%.
  • Jev for an investor: Pass for now (0.4 of 4).
  • Not investment advice: this measures what people build on GitHub, not any company.
Developers choosing toolswhich tools to adoptWatch
  • Most-starred tools here lately: roboflow/supervision (vouched), kserve/kserve (organic stars).
  • Check that a tool is still maintained before you adopt it: the field is shrinking.
  • Jev for a developer picking tools: Watch (0.5 of 4).

Repos carrying it now

roboflow/supervisionWe write your reusable computer vision tools. 💜+1.4k stars in 3 months · vouched
kserve/kserveStandardized Distributed Generative and Predictive AI Inference Platform for Scalable, Multi-Framework Deployment on Kubernetes+219 stars in 3 months · organic
charliedream1/ai_quant_tradeStock AI Trader: 1-stop platform for learning, sim & live trading. Covers: stock basics, strategies, LLMs, factor mining, ML/DL/RL, graph ne+170 stars in 3 months
alyssaxuu/screenityThe free and privacy-friendly screen recorder with no limits 🎥+119 stars in 3 months
SwanHubX/SwanLab⚡️SwanLab - an open-source, modern-design AI training tracking and visualization tool. Supports Cloud / Self-hosted use. Integrated with PyT+68 stars in 3 months · unclear
google/tf-quant-financeHigh-performance TensorFlow library for quantitative finance.+37 stars in 3 months

People building it

More in Models and research

Questions

Is TensorFlow growing on GitHub?

No, it is shrinking. Its share of all new public GitHub repos is -6% vs a year ago and -8% over the last three months (Sep 2026). Phase: Faded.

How many new TensorFlow repos are created each month?

About 732 new public repos a month carry the tensorflow tag (three-month average to Sep 2026), or 0.79 of every 10,000 new repos.

What will TensorFlow look like in 2032?

Nobody knows, and we say how much. Of past GitHub lines that held its share within 15% for a year, the middle half had between 0.48x and 1.19x of their share 3 to 5 years later, and 58% ended smaller. Jev's call: Bottom quarter of similar lines.

Is TensorFlow more talked about than built?

Talked about more than built. Over the year its share of Wikipedia views moved -38% while its share of new GitHub repos moved -6%. New repos grew faster than talk for most AI trends this year, so the label compares it with the typical trend: 2.4 times the talk per builder of the median trend.

Not investment advice. Measurements of what people build and star on GitHub, a statistical forecast, base rates and a model's reading of them. Nothing here is about any company's revenue, valuation or stock.